Both INXS and Michael Hutchence are underrated, as a band and as a singer. at least from what I can tell... then again, I'm the only person around my age I know of personally who's heard of them. So I don't really have peers to rate them anyway. But I guess this shows their music didn't survive to the next generation- maybe they didn't get famous enough. Or it's that their work wasn't really groundbreaking. I know people my age who know the great classic rock bands like Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, The Who, but when it comes to bands like U2 or INXS, they haven't usually heard of them. I wonder why that is (especially in U2's case, but that's for a different thread, I'm sure!).
I think I got off topic... I was going to say something about how good INXS were and why they shouldn't be underrated. But really, it's an opinion...