Author Topic: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013  (Read 11999 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tumbling Dice

  • Drowning Man/Woman
  • ***
  • Posts: 22458
  • I won't pay the usual fee
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #45 on: October 26, 2012, 05:15:37 PM »
Fan reviews of the Paris gig.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

They played without brass arrangements.  Could this be the first Stones' tour without a brass section since 1978?

Offline So Cruel

  • Precious Stone
  • ***
  • Posts: 2596
  • it ain't no sin to be glad that you're alive
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #46 on: October 26, 2012, 05:58:46 PM »
I hope so. I don't mind bringing Bobby Kers for the sax parts, but they've been using too many back ups (singers and players), which I think has been part of the reason why Keef is doing as much; he has people there to cover for him. The Who used a ton of musicians and back up singers on the Tommy reunion tour and it just didn't feel right. They were better when I saw them about 5 years ago without all the back up players/singers.

Offline Tumbling Dice

  • Drowning Man/Woman
  • ***
  • Posts: 22458
  • I won't pay the usual fee
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #47 on: October 26, 2012, 06:09:24 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I hope so. I don't mind bringing Bobby Kers for the sax parts, but they've been using too many back ups (singers and players), which I think has been part of the reason why Keef is doing as much; he has people there to cover for him. The Who used a ton of musicians and back up singers on the Tommy reunion tour and it just didn't feel right. They were better when I saw them about 5 years ago without all the back up players/singers.

We could get to see the raw, pure and unadulterated Stones in action. 8)

Offline wrldchamps04

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 924
  • ^^rock n roll perfection^^
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #48 on: October 27, 2012, 11:22:48 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Fan reviews of the Paris gig.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

They played without brass arrangements.  Could this be the first Stones' tour without a brass section since 1978?
i THOUGHT I read that there was 1 sax....that was apparently incorrect. They've DEFINITELY not done a tour without brass since '78 or backup vocals since '89

Offline So Cruel

  • Precious Stone
  • ***
  • Posts: 2596
  • it ain't no sin to be glad that you're alive
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #49 on: October 27, 2012, 05:41:23 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Fan reviews of the Paris gig.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

They played without brass arrangements.  Could this be the first Stones' tour without a brass section since 1978?
i THOUGHT I read that there was 1 sax....that was apparently incorrect. They've DEFINITELY not done a tour without brass since '78 or backup vocals since '89

They had 3 backup singers in '89

Offline wrldchamps04

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 924
  • ^^rock n roll perfection^^
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #50 on: October 28, 2012, 01:18:18 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Fan reviews of the Paris gig.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

They played without brass arrangements.  Could this be the first Stones' tour without a brass section since 1978?
i THOUGHT I read that there was 1 sax....that was apparently incorrect. They've DEFINITELY not done a tour without brass since '78 or backup vocals since '89

They had 3 backup singers in '89
true....I mis-worded it....'89 was the single greatest show/tour I ever saw by ANYBODY

Offline wrldchamps04

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 924
  • ^^rock n roll perfection^^
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #51 on: November 12, 2012, 11:38:43 AM »
MORE to follow in 2014???    The Rolling Stones add show at Barclays Center, Brooklyn, New York, on Saturday December 8.
 
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
Ticketing info here:
 You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline Tumbling Dice

  • Drowning Man/Woman
  • ***
  • Posts: 22458
  • I won't pay the usual fee
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #52 on: November 12, 2012, 03:18:07 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
MORE to follow in 2014???   

I think so.  They just won't be able to resist the money they could make with a full-scale tour.


Offline AchtungPop

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 917
  • Walk On
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #53 on: November 13, 2012, 11:45:30 AM »
Maybe it will inspire them to release one more album. I like Doom & Gloom and One More Shot. Get it done while those good tracks are fresh in their minds!

Offline Tumbling Dice

  • Drowning Man/Woman
  • ***
  • Posts: 22458
  • I won't pay the usual fee
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #54 on: November 13, 2012, 11:47:09 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Maybe it will inspire them to release one more album. I like Doom & Gloom and One More Shot. Get it done while those good tracks are fresh in their minds!

I fear that's all their creative juices can stew.


Offline wrldchamps04

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 924
  • ^^rock n roll perfection^^
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #55 on: November 13, 2012, 12:32:43 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
MORE to follow in 2014???   

I think so.  They just won't be able to resist the money they could make with a full-scale tour.
I think..a "semi" full scale tour will occur...not quite as many stops, to "smaller areas"....just a guess

Offline Bads316

  • Elevated
  • ***
  • Posts: 4226
  • Ain't nothin' but a muffin
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #56 on: November 16, 2012, 03:55:02 AM »
Rather than start another Stones thread -

Tomorrow night BBC 2 'Crossfire Hurricane' 10:15

« Last Edit: November 16, 2012, 04:05:33 AM by Bads316 »

Offline Tumbling Dice

  • Drowning Man/Woman
  • ***
  • Posts: 22458
  • I won't pay the usual fee
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #57 on: November 16, 2012, 10:26:41 AM »
Jo Whiley interviewed Mick Jagger yesterday on BBC Radio 2:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Offline Shark Ericson

  • Stateless
  • *
  • Posts: 173
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #58 on: November 17, 2012, 09:31:08 AM »
I saw Crossfire Hurricane the other night and it was pretty damn good!  8)

It was great seeing all the backstage footage, and it was interesting just observing the crowds (like Madison Square Garden in '72...I miss the days of no cell phones, especially at concerts)

Offline wrldchamps04

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 924
  • ^^rock n roll perfection^^
Re: Rolling Stones' 50th Anniversary Tour Pushed Back To 2013
« Reply #59 on: November 17, 2012, 10:47:41 AM »
as a huge fan...for "only" about the last last 30 years (lol)..I enjoyed the documentary, which was fairly detailed on the first 20 years...(most of which I knew)..especially the biggest moments, Brians death, Altamont, Mick T. leaving...all in all a pretty good film