Poll

Should 360 be the last stadium tour ?

Yes, having the world record tour would be a great ending to stadium shows and 360 can't be topped
4 (7.4%)
Yes, but I want stadiums at the farewell/final tour
7 (13%)
No, U2 should play stadiums as long as the demand is there
17 (31.5%)
Yes, U2 are better in arenas and I always prefer to see them there
10 (18.5%)
I'd like arenas in US/stadiums ROW mix next time, like Vertigo tour
10 (18.5%)
Make it SMALL. Amphitheatres/clubs, please
6 (11.1%)

Total Members Voted: 50

Author Topic: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?  (Read 9114 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bono2012

  • Stateless
  • *
  • Posts: 107
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #60 on: May 15, 2012, 02:02:54 AM »
Another thing to consider at this point is that playing a 110 arena shows means only playing to 2 million people. U2 played to 7.3 million people on the last tour. Does the band really want to shut out 5.3 million of their fans with an arena tour? Yes, U2.com members will indeed get tickets, but if your not a U2.com member or know someone that is, you may not be able to attend the next tour if its in Arenas.

                 Also, Scalpers will make a lot more money, big time, with an arena tour, as opposed to a stadium tour.

           The average 360 tour stadium show played to 66,110 people. The average arena show only fits about 18,500 people.

You're conveniently forgetting U2 won't be able to get away with playing big stadium tours if the next record doesn't do something spectacular.

          You're conveniently forgetting that the most spectacular thing that has ever been done in the history of concert tours was done by U2 on the 360 tour in support of their new album NO LINE ON THE HORIZON! No other album in history has had a more successful tour than NO LINE ON THE HORIZON!

          Even at U2's one low point in their concert touring ability since 1987, during POPMART, the band were still filling and even selling out many stadiums across the world.

          Also, consider that 360 toured from June 30, 2009 to July 30, 2011 during some of the worst months of the past "Great Recession". Things are slowly improving, and by the summer of 2014, you will see a far better market for tours than you did in the 2009-2011 period.

          Provided the next album is not poorly recieved like POP was, the band will not have any problems filling stadiums if they choose too.

Just because U2 sold out some stadiums it doesn't make the tour 'spectacular'.

Your final sentence finds you backtracking and coming round to my way of thinking. They have a chance now with the new album. If they blow it (which they probably will) its arenas all the way (or half empty stadiums).

            Uh, they didn't just sellout some stadiums, they soldout 110 stadiums in a 360 configeration, something that has never been done before, not even close. An average of 66,110 people per night!

            My last sentence is a reference to POP, NOT NLOTH! Try reading a little more carefully. I said if they come out with an album that does as well as NLOTH, stadiums won't be a problem, while you describe that absurdly as a disaster. LOL

            I've noted long before this that POP did lead to a decline in attendance at the shows for the POP album. But thats the only decline that the band has ever really had in its 30+ year career. Another NLOTH would be the OPPOSITE of POP in terms of its impact on the next tour. Again, no other album in the history of music has had a more successful tour than No Line On The Horizon.

Sugarcube

  • Guest
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #61 on: May 15, 2012, 05:15:05 AM »
Again, a warning to all people are are not members of U2.com, if they do an arena tour next, you may not be able to get a ticket.  The first Philadelphia show for the Vertigo tour soldout through U2.com before any tickets were released to the general public. Given the number of people who are members of U2.com today vs back in 2005, I would not be surprised to see even U2.com members get locked out of certain Arena shows.

                                                   If they play arena's on the next tour, anyone obtaining general admission tickets will be able to sell them for $300+ dollars, if they so desired. Again, scalpers would love a U2 arena tour. General admission on the arena floor is 2,000 max, compared to an average of 15,000 for the stadium.

You're talking complete nonsense. I've never been a member of any fan site and have always got tickets to both arenas and stadiums. All you need is broadband and be on the Internet when tickets go on sale. Scalpers can get tickets to any show anywhere - its not hard to outwit a scalper.

U2.com is a massive con that charges fans to get what most other big artists give away for free. It's also no deterrent to Scalpers. They'll happily pay for a subscription if the profit outweighs the outlay

           I'm talking from personal experience of what happened to ME when attempting to get tickets to the first Philadelphia Arena show on the VERTIGO tour. I'm not a novice at getting tickets at all. I've been going to shows since 1991. I saw ZOO TV in Philadelphia multiple times, saw them in Philadelphia on POPMART, went to DC for Elevation but had friends that saw then in Philadelphia on Elevation. I also did eventually get to see them in Philadephia on Vetigo, but not the first show, and I saw them in Dublin Ireland on Vertigo as well. Saw them on 360 in DC, Baltimore and Philadelphia.

                  I understand perfectly the process of buying tickets and I'm here to tell you THERE WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC SELL TO THE FIRST PHILADELPHIA SHOW. Multiple people attempted to get through online with no luck at all. A small number even waited in line at a ticketmaster location. About two minutes before 10:00 AM, the site manager came out and told everyone in line that there WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE. Everyone who went to the first Philadelphia show on Vertigo either got tickets in the pre-sell through U2.com or payed double face value on average to a scalper through one of the ticket resell sites or outside the venue before the show.

                   Paul McGuinness a few weeks later admitted that they let the fan club purchase all available tickets because the sales were going so quickly for the first Vertigo Philadelphia show. I think that may have been the only show they did that for because they always have the option to hold back tickets and release them in the public sale. But the fact is, when demand is high, and supply is low like they are with arena shows, shows could be sold out without tickets ever being released to the general public. I saw it happen first hand.   

                     There was a 2nd, 3rd and 4th Philadelphia show, all of which rapidly soldout and while the number of shows did satisfy a lot of fans, there were still many others who got shut out or were unwilling to go to ticket resellers and scalpers and pay above list price for tickets.

                    Again, when supply is low and demand is high, its a ticket scalpers dream. Stadiums, especially stadiums in 360 pushes the scalpers to the side as the supply of tickets is enough to satisfy demand.

Then you're not trying hard enough - simples. I've gotten floor tickets to every arena show since I've been seeing U2. Both in Europe and the states. Of course I can't say this is typical as I haven't seen every show U2 have ever done - but neither have you.

When bands do a pre sale they allocate a certain  number of tickets to that pre sale so it's impossible for concerts to be sold out using this method. Any band that doesn't do that (i.e. U2 in your example) is ripping people off. Imagine the glee on McGuinesses face when he discovers a way to get the ticket price AND the cost of a U2 subscription for tickets.

Either way, a U2.com membership is no deterrent at all to scalpers. They will simply buy a subscription like everyone else. U2 don't care - it's a 'revenue stream' like any other 'revenue stream'.


Sugarcube

  • Guest
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #62 on: May 15, 2012, 05:19:47 AM »
Another thing to consider at this point is that playing a 110 arena shows means only playing to 2 million people. U2 played to 7.3 million people on the last tour. Does the band really want to shut out 5.3 million of their fans with an arena tour? Yes, U2.com members will indeed get tickets, but if your not a U2.com member or know someone that is, you may not be able to attend the next tour if its in Arenas.

                 Also, Scalpers will make a lot more money, big time, with an arena tour, as opposed to a stadium tour.

           The average 360 tour stadium show played to 66,110 people. The average arena show only fits about 18,500 people.

You're conveniently forgetting U2 won't be able to get away with playing big stadium tours if the next record doesn't do something spectacular.

          You're conveniently forgetting that the most spectacular thing that has ever been done in the history of concert tours was done by U2 on the 360 tour in support of their new album NO LINE ON THE HORIZON! No other album in history has had a more successful tour than NO LINE ON THE HORIZON!

          Even at U2's one low point in their concert touring ability since 1987, during POPMART, the band were still filling and even selling out many stadiums across the world.

          Also, consider that 360 toured from June 30, 2009 to July 30, 2011 during some of the worst months of the past "Great Recession". Things are slowly improving, and by the summer of 2014, you will see a far better market for tours than you did in the 2009-2011 period.

          Provided the next album is not poorly recieved like POP was, the band will not have any problems filling stadiums if they choose too.

Just because U2 sold out some stadiums it doesn't make the tour 'spectacular'.

Your final sentence finds you backtracking and coming round to my way of thinking. They have a chance now with the new album. If they blow it (which they probably will) its arenas all the way (or half empty stadiums).

            Uh, they didn't just sellout some stadiums, they soldout 110 stadiums in a 360 configeration, something that has never been done before, not even close. An average of 66,110 people per night!

            My last sentence is a reference to POP, NOT NLOTH! Try reading a little more carefully. I said if they come out with an album that does as well as NLOTH, stadiums won't be a problem, while you describe that absurdly as a disaster. LOL

            I've noted long before this that POP did lead to a decline in attendance at the shows for the POP album. But thats the only decline that the band has ever really had in its 30+ year career. Another NLOTH would be the OPPOSITE of POP in terms of its impact on the next tour. Again, no other album in the history of music has had a more successful tour than No Line On The Horizon.

I know your last sentence was a reference to POP. You said PROVIDED the NEXT album isn't as poorly received like POP was. Fair comment, but it's what I've been arguing all along. You have been arguing they'll be selling out a massive stadium tour HOWEVER their next release is received. As neither of us know how the next album will turn out you can't state these contentions as fact.

Common sense prevails!

As for the 'spectacular' comment, my idea of 'spectacular' is an interest in quality of art. Your interest is clearly in quantity of units sold which is no measure of quality.

Offline singnomore

  • Global Moderator
  • Up With the Sun
  • ******
  • Posts: 7171
  • These city lights, they shine as silver and gold
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #63 on: May 15, 2012, 06:49:57 AM »
Guys - this is not about who is best at getting tickets - its about playing in stadiums - keep on track please

Offline JTBaby

  • Elevated
  • ***
  • Posts: 4169
  • "TWITter" Sheesh....
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #64 on: May 15, 2012, 07:09:22 AM »
Stadiums are for sports. I've seen U2 in stadiums. I've yet to see a good concert in a stadium. By anyone.



Why do U2 fans resent stadiums ?

Because at least 50% of them can't see the band ?


Offline bono2012

  • Stateless
  • *
  • Posts: 107
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #65 on: May 15, 2012, 09:36:14 AM »
Again, a warning to all people are are not members of U2.com, if they do an arena tour next, you may not be able to get a ticket.  The first Philadelphia show for the Vertigo tour soldout through U2.com before any tickets were released to the general public. Given the number of people who are members of U2.com today vs back in 2005, I would not be surprised to see even U2.com members get locked out of certain Arena shows.

                                                   If they play arena's on the next tour, anyone obtaining general admission tickets will be able to sell them for $300+ dollars, if they so desired. Again, scalpers would love a U2 arena tour. General admission on the arena floor is 2,000 max, compared to an average of 15,000 for the stadium.

You're talking complete nonsense. I've never been a member of any fan site and have always got tickets to both arenas and stadiums. All you need is broadband and be on the Internet when tickets go on sale. Scalpers can get tickets to any show anywhere - its not hard to outwit a scalper.

U2.com is a massive con that charges fans to get what most other big artists give away for free. It's also no deterrent to Scalpers. They'll happily pay for a subscription if the profit outweighs the outlay

           I'm talking from personal experience of what happened to ME when attempting to get tickets to the first Philadelphia Arena show on the VERTIGO tour. I'm not a novice at getting tickets at all. I've been going to shows since 1991. I saw ZOO TV in Philadelphia multiple times, saw them in Philadelphia on POPMART, went to DC for Elevation but had friends that saw then in Philadelphia on Elevation. I also did eventually get to see them in Philadephia on Vetigo, but not the first show, and I saw them in Dublin Ireland on Vertigo as well. Saw them on 360 in DC, Baltimore and Philadelphia.

                  I understand perfectly the process of buying tickets and I'm here to tell you THERE WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC SELL TO THE FIRST PHILADELPHIA SHOW. Multiple people attempted to get through online with no luck at all. A small number even waited in line at a ticketmaster location. About two minutes before 10:00 AM, the site manager came out and told everyone in line that there WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE. Everyone who went to the first Philadelphia show on Vertigo either got tickets in the pre-sell through U2.com or payed double face value on average to a scalper through one of the ticket resell sites or outside the venue before the show.

                   Paul McGuinness a few weeks later admitted that they let the fan club purchase all available tickets because the sales were going so quickly for the first Vertigo Philadelphia show. I think that may have been the only show they did that for because they always have the option to hold back tickets and release them in the public sale. But the fact is, when demand is high, and supply is low like they are with arena shows, shows could be sold out without tickets ever being released to the general public. I saw it happen first hand.   

                     There was a 2nd, 3rd and 4th Philadelphia show, all of which rapidly soldout and while the number of shows did satisfy a lot of fans, there were still many others who got shut out or were unwilling to go to ticket resellers and scalpers and pay above list price for tickets.

                    Again, when supply is low and demand is high, its a ticket scalpers dream. Stadiums, especially stadiums in 360 pushes the scalpers to the side as the supply of tickets is enough to satisfy demand.

Then you're not trying hard enough - simples. I've gotten floor tickets to every arena show since I've been seeing U2. Both in Europe and the states. Of course I can't say this is typical as I haven't seen every show U2 have ever done - but neither have you.

When bands do a pre sale they allocate a certain  number of tickets to that pre sale so it's impossible for concerts to be sold out using this method. Any band that doesn't do that (i.e. U2 in your example) is ripping people off. Imagine the glee on McGuinesses face when he discovers a way to get the ticket price AND the cost of a U2 subscription for tickets.

Either way, a U2.com membership is no deterrent at all to scalpers. They will simply buy a subscription like everyone else. U2 don't care - it's a 'revenue stream' like any other 'revenue stream'.

Yes, there are always scalpers available with any tickets you would like, but I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about getting the tickets you want through the normal public sale for an 18,500 capacity arena where there are only 2,000 tickets for the floor. Its far more difficult to get what you want in that situation than it is when the band is playing a 66,500 capacity venue. Any understanding of math, statistics and probability would let you know that, let alone personal experience.

             As for Arena's, U2 rarely plays arena's in Europe. Since 1990, they have only played arena's briefly in Europe in the summer of 1992 and the summer of 2001. In the summer of 1992, the speed of internet sales was not a factor since there were no tickets on that tour that were sold through the internet which leaves only the 2001 arena tour where modern buying practices were in place for a U2 arena tour in Europe.

            Yes, when artist do pre-sales, tickets are held back for the public, usually, but in Philadelphia for the first Vertigo show, this did not happen and all tickets were sold through the fan club.

            Where did I say U2.com was a deterent to scalpers? I've mentioned U2.com as an important way to get tickets if the band is playing arena's. But if the band is in stadiums in a 360 configeration, U2.com and scalpers don't matter in terms  of getting tickets. Both become relevant though if U2 go back into arena's.

            But one advantage that long time members of U2.com have since the new fan club started in 2004/2005 is that the first group of people that have maintained their membership each year for the past 7 years are in the higher first group Horizon group. That allows them to purchase tickets before most U2.com members who have not been members of U2.com every year since 2004/2005. While there may be some scalpers that have maintained a membership like that, its a much smaller number vs. scalpers who simply become members before the start of a tour and don't maintain a membership year after year when the band is not touring.

             These are all relevant things to consider and remember when thinking about the issue of U2 playing stadiums or arena's on the next tour.

Sugarcube

  • Guest
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #66 on: May 15, 2012, 09:45:16 AM »
Again, a warning to all people are are not members of U2.com, if they do an arena tour next, you may not be able to get a ticket.  The first Philadelphia show for the Vertigo tour soldout through U2.com before any tickets were released to the general public. Given the number of people who are members of U2.com today vs back in 2005, I would not be surprised to see even U2.com members get locked out of certain Arena shows.

                                                   If they play arena's on the next tour, anyone obtaining general admission tickets will be able to sell them for $300+ dollars, if they so desired. Again, scalpers would love a U2 arena tour. General admission on the arena floor is 2,000 max, compared to an average of 15,000 for the stadium.

You're talking complete nonsense. I've never been a member of any fan site and have always got tickets to both arenas and stadiums. All you need is broadband and be on the Internet when tickets go on sale. Scalpers can get tickets to any show anywhere - its not hard to outwit a scalper.

U2.com is a massive con that charges fans to get what most other big artists give away for free. It's also no deterrent to Scalpers. They'll happily pay for a subscription if the profit outweighs the outlay

           I'm talking from personal experience of what happened to ME when attempting to get tickets to the first Philadelphia Arena show on the VERTIGO tour. I'm not a novice at getting tickets at all. I've been going to shows since 1991. I saw ZOO TV in Philadelphia multiple times, saw them in Philadelphia on POPMART, went to DC for Elevation but had friends that saw then in Philadelphia on Elevation. I also did eventually get to see them in Philadephia on Vetigo, but not the first show, and I saw them in Dublin Ireland on Vertigo as well. Saw them on 360 in DC, Baltimore and Philadelphia.

                  I understand perfectly the process of buying tickets and I'm here to tell you THERE WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC SELL TO THE FIRST PHILADELPHIA SHOW. Multiple people attempted to get through online with no luck at all. A small number even waited in line at a ticketmaster location. About two minutes before 10:00 AM, the site manager came out and told everyone in line that there WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE. Everyone who went to the first Philadelphia show on Vertigo either got tickets in the pre-sell through U2.com or payed double face value on average to a scalper through one of the ticket resell sites or outside the venue before the show.

                   Paul McGuinness a few weeks later admitted that they let the fan club purchase all available tickets because the sales were going so quickly for the first Vertigo Philadelphia show. I think that may have been the only show they did that for because they always have the option to hold back tickets and release them in the public sale. But the fact is, when demand is high, and supply is low like they are with arena shows, shows could be sold out without tickets ever being released to the general public. I saw it happen first hand.   

                     There was a 2nd, 3rd and 4th Philadelphia show, all of which rapidly soldout and while the number of shows did satisfy a lot of fans, there were still many others who got shut out or were unwilling to go to ticket resellers and scalpers and pay above list price for tickets.

                    Again, when supply is low and demand is high, its a ticket scalpers dream. Stadiums, especially stadiums in 360 pushes the scalpers to the side as the supply of tickets is enough to satisfy demand.

Then you're not trying hard enough - simples. I've gotten floor tickets to every arena show since I've been seeing U2. Both in Europe and the states. Of course I can't say this is typical as I haven't seen every show U2 have ever done - but neither have you.

When bands do a pre sale they allocate a certain  number of tickets to that pre sale so it's impossible for concerts to be sold out using this method. Any band that doesn't do that (i.e. U2 in your example) is ripping people off. Imagine the glee on McGuinesses face when he discovers a way to get the ticket price AND the cost of a U2 subscription for tickets.

Either way, a U2.com membership is no deterrent at all to scalpers. They will simply buy a subscription like everyone else. U2 don't care - it's a 'revenue stream' like any other 'revenue stream'.

Yes, there are always scalpers available with any tickets you would like, but I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about getting the tickets you want through the normal public sale for an 18,500 capacity arena where there are only 2,000 tickets for the floor. Its far more difficult to get what you want in that situation than it is when the band is playing a 66,500 capacity venue. Any understanding of math, statistics and probability would let you know that, let alone personal experience.

             As for Arena's, U2 rarely plays arena's in Europe. Since 1990, they have only played arena's briefly in Europe in the summer of 1992 and the summer of 2001. In the summer of 1992, the speed of internet sales was not a factor since there were no tickets on that tour that were sold through the internet which leaves only the 2001 arena tour where modern buying practices were in place for a U2 arena tour in Europe.

            Yes, when artist do pre-sales, tickets are held back for the public, usually, but in Philadelphia for the first Vertigo show, this did not happen and all tickets were sold through the fan club.

            Where did I say U2.com was a deterent to scalpers? I've mentioned U2.com as an important way to get tickets if the band is playing arena's. But if the band is in stadiums in a 360 configeration, U2.com and scalpers don't matter in terms  of getting tickets. Both become relevant though if U2 go back into arena's.

            But one advantage that long time members of U2.com have since the new fan club started in 2004/2005 is that the first group of people that have maintained their membership each year for the past 7 years are in the higher first group Horizon group. That allows them to purchase tickets before most U2.com members who have not been members of U2.com every year since 2004/2005. While there may be some scalpers that have maintained a membership like that, its a much smaller number vs. scalpers who simply become members before the start of a tour and don't maintain a membership year after year when the band is not touring.

             These are all relevant things to consider and remember when thinking about the issue of U2 playing stadiums or arena's on the next tour.

The simple fact is your technique is wrong if you have trouble getting tickets. I've always managed to get floor tickets for arena dates. You're obviously doing it wrong.

As for the next tour if U2 don't pull their fingers out they will be forced back into arenas anyway so the demand for tickets simply won't be as high.

It goes without saying U2.coms cynical attempts to keep people buying a subscription are a disgrace.

Offline bono2012

  • Stateless
  • *
  • Posts: 107
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #67 on: May 15, 2012, 09:46:23 AM »
Another thing to consider at this point is that playing a 110 arena shows means only playing to 2 million people. U2 played to 7.3 million people on the last tour. Does the band really want to shut out 5.3 million of their fans with an arena tour? Yes, U2.com members will indeed get tickets, but if your not a U2.com member or know someone that is, you may not be able to attend the next tour if its in Arenas.

                 Also, Scalpers will make a lot more money, big time, with an arena tour, as opposed to a stadium tour.

           The average 360 tour stadium show played to 66,110 people. The average arena show only fits about 18,500 people.

You're conveniently forgetting U2 won't be able to get away with playing big stadium tours if the next record doesn't do something spectacular.

          You're conveniently forgetting that the most spectacular thing that has ever been done in the history of concert tours was done by U2 on the 360 tour in support of their new album NO LINE ON THE HORIZON! No other album in history has had a more successful tour than NO LINE ON THE HORIZON!

          Even at U2's one low point in their concert touring ability since 1987, during POPMART, the band were still filling and even selling out many stadiums across the world.

          Also, consider that 360 toured from June 30, 2009 to July 30, 2011 during some of the worst months of the past "Great Recession". Things are slowly improving, and by the summer of 2014, you will see a far better market for tours than you did in the 2009-2011 period.

          Provided the next album is not poorly recieved like POP was, the band will not have any problems filling stadiums if they choose too.

Just because U2 sold out some stadiums it doesn't make the tour 'spectacular'.

Your final sentence finds you backtracking and coming round to my way of thinking. They have a chance now with the new album. If they blow it (which they probably will) its arenas all the way (or half empty stadiums).

            Uh, they didn't just sellout some stadiums, they soldout 110 stadiums in a 360 configeration, something that has never been done before, not even close. An average of 66,110 people per night!

            My last sentence is a reference to POP, NOT NLOTH! Try reading a little more carefully. I said if they come out with an album that does as well as NLOTH, stadiums won't be a problem, while you describe that absurdly as a disaster. LOL

            I've noted long before this that POP did lead to a decline in attendance at the shows for the POP album. But thats the only decline that the band has ever really had in its 30+ year career. Another NLOTH would be the OPPOSITE of POP in terms of its impact on the next tour. Again, no other album in the history of music has had a more successful tour than No Line On The Horizon.

I know your last sentence was a reference to POP. You said PROVIDED the NEXT album isn't as poorly received like POP was. Fair comment, but it's what I've been arguing all along. You have been arguing they'll be selling out a massive stadium tour HOWEVER their next release is received. As neither of us know how the next album will turn out you can't state these contentions as fact.

Common sense prevails!

As for the 'spectacular' comment, my idea of 'spectacular' is an interest in quality of art. Your interest is clearly in quantity of units sold which is no measure of quality.

          Nope, you have been arguing all along that NLOTH was a disaster that will prevent U2 from playing stadiums on the next tour. I've consistently been stating that is not the case but have NEVER stated that if the next album was received like POP that they would not see a decline in attendance.

          NLOTH was received well, POP relatively was not received well.

        Your interest, quality of art is pure opinion, never fact, and cannot be proven either way. The points I make are about things that can be proven, are fact, and NOT opinion like quantity of tickets sold. Two people can argue forever about the quality of a piece of art, and neither one of them will ever be wrong or right because its an opinion. Not so when talking about sales data.

Offline bono2012

  • Stateless
  • *
  • Posts: 107
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #68 on: May 15, 2012, 09:53:06 AM »
Again, a warning to all people are are not members of U2.com, if they do an arena tour next, you may not be able to get a ticket.  The first Philadelphia show for the Vertigo tour soldout through U2.com before any tickets were released to the general public. Given the number of people who are members of U2.com today vs back in 2005, I would not be surprised to see even U2.com members get locked out of certain Arena shows.

                                                   If they play arena's on the next tour, anyone obtaining general admission tickets will be able to sell them for $300+ dollars, if they so desired. Again, scalpers would love a U2 arena tour. General admission on the arena floor is 2,000 max, compared to an average of 15,000 for the stadium.

You're talking complete nonsense. I've never been a member of any fan site and have always got tickets to both arenas and stadiums. All you need is broadband and be on the Internet when tickets go on sale. Scalpers can get tickets to any show anywhere - its not hard to outwit a scalper.

U2.com is a massive con that charges fans to get what most other big artists give away for free. It's also no deterrent to Scalpers. They'll happily pay for a subscription if the profit outweighs the outlay

           I'm talking from personal experience of what happened to ME when attempting to get tickets to the first Philadelphia Arena show on the VERTIGO tour. I'm not a novice at getting tickets at all. I've been going to shows since 1991. I saw ZOO TV in Philadelphia multiple times, saw them in Philadelphia on POPMART, went to DC for Elevation but had friends that saw then in Philadelphia on Elevation. I also did eventually get to see them in Philadephia on Vetigo, but not the first show, and I saw them in Dublin Ireland on Vertigo as well. Saw them on 360 in DC, Baltimore and Philadelphia.

                  I understand perfectly the process of buying tickets and I'm here to tell you THERE WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC SELL TO THE FIRST PHILADELPHIA SHOW. Multiple people attempted to get through online with no luck at all. A small number even waited in line at a ticketmaster location. About two minutes before 10:00 AM, the site manager came out and told everyone in line that there WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE. Everyone who went to the first Philadelphia show on Vertigo either got tickets in the pre-sell through U2.com or payed double face value on average to a scalper through one of the ticket resell sites or outside the venue before the show.

                   Paul McGuinness a few weeks later admitted that they let the fan club purchase all available tickets because the sales were going so quickly for the first Vertigo Philadelphia show. I think that may have been the only show they did that for because they always have the option to hold back tickets and release them in the public sale. But the fact is, when demand is high, and supply is low like they are with arena shows, shows could be sold out without tickets ever being released to the general public. I saw it happen first hand.   

                     There was a 2nd, 3rd and 4th Philadelphia show, all of which rapidly soldout and while the number of shows did satisfy a lot of fans, there were still many others who got shut out or were unwilling to go to ticket resellers and scalpers and pay above list price for tickets.

                    Again, when supply is low and demand is high, its a ticket scalpers dream. Stadiums, especially stadiums in 360 pushes the scalpers to the side as the supply of tickets is enough to satisfy demand.

Then you're not trying hard enough - simples. I've gotten floor tickets to every arena show since I've been seeing U2. Both in Europe and the states. Of course I can't say this is typical as I haven't seen every show U2 have ever done - but neither have you.

When bands do a pre sale they allocate a certain  number of tickets to that pre sale so it's impossible for concerts to be sold out using this method. Any band that doesn't do that (i.e. U2 in your example) is ripping people off. Imagine the glee on McGuinesses face when he discovers a way to get the ticket price AND the cost of a U2 subscription for tickets.

Either way, a U2.com membership is no deterrent at all to scalpers. They will simply buy a subscription like everyone else. U2 don't care - it's a 'revenue stream' like any other 'revenue stream'.

Yes, there are always scalpers available with any tickets you would like, but I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about getting the tickets you want through the normal public sale for an 18,500 capacity arena where there are only 2,000 tickets for the floor. Its far more difficult to get what you want in that situation than it is when the band is playing a 66,500 capacity venue. Any understanding of math, statistics and probability would let you know that, let alone personal experience.

             As for Arena's, U2 rarely plays arena's in Europe. Since 1990, they have only played arena's briefly in Europe in the summer of 1992 and the summer of 2001. In the summer of 1992, the speed of internet sales was not a factor since there were no tickets on that tour that were sold through the internet which leaves only the 2001 arena tour where modern buying practices were in place for a U2 arena tour in Europe.

            Yes, when artist do pre-sales, tickets are held back for the public, usually, but in Philadelphia for the first Vertigo show, this did not happen and all tickets were sold through the fan club.

            Where did I say U2.com was a deterent to scalpers? I've mentioned U2.com as an important way to get tickets if the band is playing arena's. But if the band is in stadiums in a 360 configeration, U2.com and scalpers don't matter in terms  of getting tickets. Both become relevant though if U2 go back into arena's.

            But one advantage that long time members of U2.com have since the new fan club started in 2004/2005 is that the first group of people that have maintained their membership each year for the past 7 years are in the higher first group Horizon group. That allows them to purchase tickets before most U2.com members who have not been members of U2.com every year since 2004/2005. While there may be some scalpers that have maintained a membership like that, its a much smaller number vs. scalpers who simply become members before the start of a tour and don't maintain a membership year after year when the band is not touring.

             These are all relevant things to consider and remember when thinking about the issue of U2 playing stadiums or arena's on the next tour.

The simple fact is your technique is wrong if you have trouble getting tickets. I've always managed to get floor tickets for arena dates. You're obviously doing it wrong.

As for the next tour if U2 don't pull their fingers out they will be forced back into arenas anyway so the demand for tickets simply won't be as high.

It goes without saying U2.coms cynical attempts to keep people buying a subscription are a disgrace.

                Its like this, when 15,000 people to an arena show all want floor tickets, only 2,000 are going to get floor tickets. Understand? When 66,000 people want tickets to a U2 arena show, only 18,500 are going to get tickets. Understand? No technique is going to change those facts.

                Also, no technique is going to get you tickets when tickets go on sell to the public, IF all tickets were already sold through the presale. Your technique can't get you tickets that have already been sold unless you go to a scalper.

Sugarcube

  • Guest
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #69 on: May 15, 2012, 10:14:11 AM »
Another thing to consider at this point is that playing a 110 arena shows means only playing to 2 million people. U2 played to 7.3 million people on the last tour. Does the band really want to shut out 5.3 million of their fans with an arena tour? Yes, U2.com members will indeed get tickets, but if your not a U2.com member or know someone that is, you may not be able to attend the next tour if its in Arenas.

                 Also, Scalpers will make a lot more money, big time, with an arena tour, as opposed to a stadium tour.

           The average 360 tour stadium show played to 66,110 people. The average arena show only fits about 18,500 people.

You're conveniently forgetting U2 won't be able to get away with playing big stadium tours if the next record doesn't do something spectacular.

          You're conveniently forgetting that the most spectacular thing that has ever been done in the history of concert tours was done by U2 on the 360 tour in support of their new album NO LINE ON THE HORIZON! No other album in history has had a more successful tour than NO LINE ON THE HORIZON!

          Even at U2's one low point in their concert touring ability since 1987, during POPMART, the band were still filling and even selling out many stadiums across the world.

          Also, consider that 360 toured from June 30, 2009 to July 30, 2011 during some of the worst months of the past "Great Recession". Things are slowly improving, and by the summer of 2014, you will see a far better market for tours than you did in the 2009-2011 period.

          Provided the next album is not poorly recieved like POP was, the band will not have any problems filling stadiums if they choose too.

Just because U2 sold out some stadiums it doesn't make the tour 'spectacular'.

Your final sentence finds you backtracking and coming round to my way of thinking. They have a chance now with the new album. If they blow it (which they probably will) its arenas all the way (or half empty stadiums).

            Uh, they didn't just sellout some stadiums, they soldout 110 stadiums in a 360 configeration, something that has never been done before, not even close. An average of 66,110 people per night!

            My last sentence is a reference to POP, NOT NLOTH! Try reading a little more carefully. I said if they come out with an album that does as well as NLOTH, stadiums won't be a problem, while you describe that absurdly as a disaster. LOL

            I've noted long before this that POP did lead to a decline in attendance at the shows for the POP album. But thats the only decline that the band has ever really had in its 30+ year career. Another NLOTH would be the OPPOSITE of POP in terms of its impact on the next tour. Again, no other album in the history of music has had a more successful tour than No Line On The Horizon.

I know your last sentence was a reference to POP. You said PROVIDED the NEXT album isn't as poorly received like POP was. Fair comment, but it's what I've been arguing all along. You have been arguing they'll be selling out a massive stadium tour HOWEVER their next release is received. As neither of us know how the next album will turn out you can't state these contentions as fact.

Common sense prevails!

As for the 'spectacular' comment, my idea of 'spectacular' is an interest in quality of art. Your interest is clearly in quantity of units sold which is no measure of quality.

          Nope, you have been arguing all along that NLOTH was a disaster that will prevent U2 from playing stadiums on the next tour. I've consistently been stating that is not the case but have NEVER stated that if the next album was received like POP that they would not see a decline in attendance.

          NLOTH was received well, POP relatively was not received well.

        Your interest, quality of art is pure opinion, never fact, and cannot be proven either way. The points I make are about things that can be proven, are fact, and NOT opinion like quantity of tickets sold. Two people can argue forever about the quality of a piece of art, and neither one of them will ever be wrong or right because its an opinion. Not so when talking about sales data.

I said if U2 don't pull something great out of the bag next time, they will be playing arenas.

You have constantly stated that U2 will play stadiums next time regardless. Until, that is, you said this:

<Provided the next album is not poorly recieved like POP was, the band will not have any problems filling stadiums if they choose too.>

Sugarcube

  • Guest
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #70 on: May 15, 2012, 10:18:11 AM »
Again, a warning to all people are are not members of U2.com, if they do an arena tour next, you may not be able to get a ticket.  The first Philadelphia show for the Vertigo tour soldout through U2.com before any tickets were released to the general public. Given the number of people who are members of U2.com today vs back in 2005, I would not be surprised to see even U2.com members get locked out of certain Arena shows.

                                                   If they play arena's on the next tour, anyone obtaining general admission tickets will be able to sell them for $300+ dollars, if they so desired. Again, scalpers would love a U2 arena tour. General admission on the arena floor is 2,000 max, compared to an average of 15,000 for the stadium.

You're talking complete nonsense. I've never been a member of any fan site and have always got tickets to both arenas and stadiums. All you need is broadband and be on the Internet when tickets go on sale. Scalpers can get tickets to any show anywhere - its not hard to outwit a scalper.

U2.com is a massive con that charges fans to get what most other big artists give away for free. It's also no deterrent to Scalpers. They'll happily pay for a subscription if the profit outweighs the outlay

           I'm talking from personal experience of what happened to ME when attempting to get tickets to the first Philadelphia Arena show on the VERTIGO tour. I'm not a novice at getting tickets at all. I've been going to shows since 1991. I saw ZOO TV in Philadelphia multiple times, saw them in Philadelphia on POPMART, went to DC for Elevation but had friends that saw then in Philadelphia on Elevation. I also did eventually get to see them in Philadephia on Vetigo, but not the first show, and I saw them in Dublin Ireland on Vertigo as well. Saw them on 360 in DC, Baltimore and Philadelphia.

                  I understand perfectly the process of buying tickets and I'm here to tell you THERE WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC SELL TO THE FIRST PHILADELPHIA SHOW. Multiple people attempted to get through online with no luck at all. A small number even waited in line at a ticketmaster location. About two minutes before 10:00 AM, the site manager came out and told everyone in line that there WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE. Everyone who went to the first Philadelphia show on Vertigo either got tickets in the pre-sell through U2.com or payed double face value on average to a scalper through one of the ticket resell sites or outside the venue before the show.

                   Paul McGuinness a few weeks later admitted that they let the fan club purchase all available tickets because the sales were going so quickly for the first Vertigo Philadelphia show. I think that may have been the only show they did that for because they always have the option to hold back tickets and release them in the public sale. But the fact is, when demand is high, and supply is low like they are with arena shows, shows could be sold out without tickets ever being released to the general public. I saw it happen first hand.   

                     There was a 2nd, 3rd and 4th Philadelphia show, all of which rapidly soldout and while the number of shows did satisfy a lot of fans, there were still many others who got shut out or were unwilling to go to ticket resellers and scalpers and pay above list price for tickets.

                    Again, when supply is low and demand is high, its a ticket scalpers dream. Stadiums, especially stadiums in 360 pushes the scalpers to the side as the supply of tickets is enough to satisfy demand.

Then you're not trying hard enough - simples. I've gotten floor tickets to every arena show since I've been seeing U2. Both in Europe and the states. Of course I can't say this is typical as I haven't seen every show U2 have ever done - but neither have you.

When bands do a pre sale they allocate a certain  number of tickets to that pre sale so it's impossible for concerts to be sold out using this method. Any band that doesn't do that (i.e. U2 in your example) is ripping people off. Imagine the glee on McGuinesses face when he discovers a way to get the ticket price AND the cost of a U2 subscription for tickets.

Either way, a U2.com membership is no deterrent at all to scalpers. They will simply buy a subscription like everyone else. U2 don't care - it's a 'revenue stream' like any other 'revenue stream'.

Yes, there are always scalpers available with any tickets you would like, but I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about getting the tickets you want through the normal public sale for an 18,500 capacity arena where there are only 2,000 tickets for the floor. Its far more difficult to get what you want in that situation than it is when the band is playing a 66,500 capacity venue. Any understanding of math, statistics and probability would let you know that, let alone personal experience.

             As for Arena's, U2 rarely plays arena's in Europe. Since 1990, they have only played arena's briefly in Europe in the summer of 1992 and the summer of 2001. In the summer of 1992, the speed of internet sales was not a factor since there were no tickets on that tour that were sold through the internet which leaves only the 2001 arena tour where modern buying practices were in place for a U2 arena tour in Europe.

            Yes, when artist do pre-sales, tickets are held back for the public, usually, but in Philadelphia for the first Vertigo show, this did not happen and all tickets were sold through the fan club.

            Where did I say U2.com was a deterent to scalpers? I've mentioned U2.com as an important way to get tickets if the band is playing arena's. But if the band is in stadiums in a 360 configeration, U2.com and scalpers don't matter in terms  of getting tickets. Both become relevant though if U2 go back into arena's.

            But one advantage that long time members of U2.com have since the new fan club started in 2004/2005 is that the first group of people that have maintained their membership each year for the past 7 years are in the higher first group Horizon group. That allows them to purchase tickets before most U2.com members who have not been members of U2.com every year since 2004/2005. While there may be some scalpers that have maintained a membership like that, its a much smaller number vs. scalpers who simply become members before the start of a tour and don't maintain a membership year after year when the band is not touring.

             These are all relevant things to consider and remember when thinking about the issue of U2 playing stadiums or arena's on the next tour.

The simple fact is your technique is wrong if you have trouble getting tickets. I've always managed to get floor tickets for arena dates. You're obviously doing it wrong.

As for the next tour if U2 don't pull their fingers out they will be forced back into arenas anyway so the demand for tickets simply won't be as high.

It goes without saying U2.coms cynical attempts to keep people buying a subscription are a disgrace.

                Its like this, when 15,000 people to an arena show all want floor tickets, only 2,000 are going to get floor tickets. Understand? When 66,000 people want tickets to a U2 arena show, only 18,500 are going to get tickets. Understand? No technique is going to change those facts.

                Also, no technique is going to get you tickets when tickets go on sell to the public, IF all tickets were already sold through the presale. Your technique can't get you tickets that have already been sold unless you go to a scalper.

Yes, I understand the maths, complex as it is.

We've already established only a limited number of tickets are available through all (or mostly all) pre sales so your point is invalid.

As a general rule, if a band plays arenas it's because that's all they can fill therefore demand goes down.

I've seen Springsteen in huge football stadiums and massive parks and festivals. Doesn't mean to say I couldn't get an arena ticket for the same tour relatively easily as that's exactly what I have done.

You're technique is all wrong.

Offline bono2012

  • Stateless
  • *
  • Posts: 107
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #71 on: May 15, 2012, 12:24:55 PM »
Another thing to consider at this point is that playing a 110 arena shows means only playing to 2 million people. U2 played to 7.3 million people on the last tour. Does the band really want to shut out 5.3 million of their fans with an arena tour? Yes, U2.com members will indeed get tickets, but if your not a U2.com member or know someone that is, you may not be able to attend the next tour if its in Arenas.

                 Also, Scalpers will make a lot more money, big time, with an arena tour, as opposed to a stadium tour.

           The average 360 tour stadium show played to 66,110 people. The average arena show only fits about 18,500 people.

You're conveniently forgetting U2 won't be able to get away with playing big stadium tours if the next record doesn't do something spectacular.

          You're conveniently forgetting that the most spectacular thing that has ever been done in the history of concert tours was done by U2 on the 360 tour in support of their new album NO LINE ON THE HORIZON! No other album in history has had a more successful tour than NO LINE ON THE HORIZON!

          Even at U2's one low point in their concert touring ability since 1987, during POPMART, the band were still filling and even selling out many stadiums across the world.

          Also, consider that 360 toured from June 30, 2009 to July 30, 2011 during some of the worst months of the past "Great Recession". Things are slowly improving, and by the summer of 2014, you will see a far better market for tours than you did in the 2009-2011 period.

          Provided the next album is not poorly recieved like POP was, the band will not have any problems filling stadiums if they choose too.

Just because U2 sold out some stadiums it doesn't make the tour 'spectacular'.

Your final sentence finds you backtracking and coming round to my way of thinking. They have a chance now with the new album. If they blow it (which they probably will) its arenas all the way (or half empty stadiums).

            Uh, they didn't just sellout some stadiums, they soldout 110 stadiums in a 360 configeration, something that has never been done before, not even close. An average of 66,110 people per night!

            My last sentence is a reference to POP, NOT NLOTH! Try reading a little more carefully. I said if they come out with an album that does as well as NLOTH, stadiums won't be a problem, while you describe that absurdly as a disaster. LOL

            I've noted long before this that POP did lead to a decline in attendance at the shows for the POP album. But thats the only decline that the band has ever really had in its 30+ year career. Another NLOTH would be the OPPOSITE of POP in terms of its impact on the next tour. Again, no other album in the history of music has had a more successful tour than No Line On The Horizon.

I know your last sentence was a reference to POP. You said PROVIDED the NEXT album isn't as poorly received like POP was. Fair comment, but it's what I've been arguing all along. You have been arguing they'll be selling out a massive stadium tour HOWEVER their next release is received. As neither of us know how the next album will turn out you can't state these contentions as fact.

Common sense prevails!

As for the 'spectacular' comment, my idea of 'spectacular' is an interest in quality of art. Your interest is clearly in quantity of units sold which is no measure of quality.

          Nope, you have been arguing all along that NLOTH was a disaster that will prevent U2 from playing stadiums on the next tour. I've consistently been stating that is not the case but have NEVER stated that if the next album was received like POP that they would not see a decline in attendance.

          NLOTH was received well, POP relatively was not received well.

        Your interest, quality of art is pure opinion, never fact, and cannot be proven either way. The points I make are about things that can be proven, are fact, and NOT opinion like quantity of tickets sold. Two people can argue forever about the quality of a piece of art, and neither one of them will ever be wrong or right because its an opinion. Not so when talking about sales data.

I said if U2 don't pull something great out of the bag next time, they will be playing arenas.

You have constantly stated that U2 will play stadiums next time regardless. Until, that is, you said this:

<Provided the next album is not poorly recieved like POP was, the band will not have any problems filling stadiums if they choose too.>

             Uh, the following has actually been what you have been peddling through multiple threads now. This is an exact qoute:

Quote
Given the artistic and commercial failure of NLOTH, I guarantee they'll be playing arenas next time.

          Now, where did I say that U2 would be playing stadiums on the next tour REGARDLESS of any factor?  Please, quote me where I said that. Of course, given that you FAILED to quote U2 on "disapointed" and "commercial failure", I think I know what the results will be. LOL

         

Offline xy

  • Party Girl/Boy
  • **
  • Posts: 688
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #72 on: May 15, 2012, 12:43:56 PM »
Stadiums are for sports. I've seen U2 in stadiums. I've yet to see a good concert in a stadium. By anyone.



Why do U2 fans resent stadiums ?

Because at least 50% of them can't see the band ?



Most people are there to see the spectacle/the show in a stadium. We all know what the band looks like, we don't need to see the whites of their eyes live.

Offline bono2012

  • Stateless
  • *
  • Posts: 107
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #73 on: May 15, 2012, 12:46:25 PM »
Again, a warning to all people are are not members of U2.com, if they do an arena tour next, you may not be able to get a ticket.  The first Philadelphia show for the Vertigo tour soldout through U2.com before any tickets were released to the general public. Given the number of people who are members of U2.com today vs back in 2005, I would not be surprised to see even U2.com members get locked out of certain Arena shows.

                                                   If they play arena's on the next tour, anyone obtaining general admission tickets will be able to sell them for $300+ dollars, if they so desired. Again, scalpers would love a U2 arena tour. General admission on the arena floor is 2,000 max, compared to an average of 15,000 for the stadium.

You're talking complete nonsense. I've never been a member of any fan site and have always got tickets to both arenas and stadiums. All you need is broadband and be on the Internet when tickets go on sale. Scalpers can get tickets to any show anywhere - its not hard to outwit a scalper.

U2.com is a massive con that charges fans to get what most other big artists give away for free. It's also no deterrent to Scalpers. They'll happily pay for a subscription if the profit outweighs the outlay

           I'm talking from personal experience of what happened to ME when attempting to get tickets to the first Philadelphia Arena show on the VERTIGO tour. I'm not a novice at getting tickets at all. I've been going to shows since 1991. I saw ZOO TV in Philadelphia multiple times, saw them in Philadelphia on POPMART, went to DC for Elevation but had friends that saw then in Philadelphia on Elevation. I also did eventually get to see them in Philadephia on Vetigo, but not the first show, and I saw them in Dublin Ireland on Vertigo as well. Saw them on 360 in DC, Baltimore and Philadelphia.

                  I understand perfectly the process of buying tickets and I'm here to tell you THERE WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC SELL TO THE FIRST PHILADELPHIA SHOW. Multiple people attempted to get through online with no luck at all. A small number even waited in line at a ticketmaster location. About two minutes before 10:00 AM, the site manager came out and told everyone in line that there WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE. Everyone who went to the first Philadelphia show on Vertigo either got tickets in the pre-sell through U2.com or payed double face value on average to a scalper through one of the ticket resell sites or outside the venue before the show.

                   Paul McGuinness a few weeks later admitted that they let the fan club purchase all available tickets because the sales were going so quickly for the first Vertigo Philadelphia show. I think that may have been the only show they did that for because they always have the option to hold back tickets and release them in the public sale. But the fact is, when demand is high, and supply is low like they are with arena shows, shows could be sold out without tickets ever being released to the general public. I saw it happen first hand.   

                     There was a 2nd, 3rd and 4th Philadelphia show, all of which rapidly soldout and while the number of shows did satisfy a lot of fans, there were still many others who got shut out or were unwilling to go to ticket resellers and scalpers and pay above list price for tickets.

                    Again, when supply is low and demand is high, its a ticket scalpers dream. Stadiums, especially stadiums in 360 pushes the scalpers to the side as the supply of tickets is enough to satisfy demand.

Then you're not trying hard enough - simples. I've gotten floor tickets to every arena show since I've been seeing U2. Both in Europe and the states. Of course I can't say this is typical as I haven't seen every show U2 have ever done - but neither have you.

When bands do a pre sale they allocate a certain  number of tickets to that pre sale so it's impossible for concerts to be sold out using this method. Any band that doesn't do that (i.e. U2 in your example) is ripping people off. Imagine the glee on McGuinesses face when he discovers a way to get the ticket price AND the cost of a U2 subscription for tickets.

Either way, a U2.com membership is no deterrent at all to scalpers. They will simply buy a subscription like everyone else. U2 don't care - it's a 'revenue stream' like any other 'revenue stream'.

Yes, there are always scalpers available with any tickets you would like, but I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about getting the tickets you want through the normal public sale for an 18,500 capacity arena where there are only 2,000 tickets for the floor. Its far more difficult to get what you want in that situation than it is when the band is playing a 66,500 capacity venue. Any understanding of math, statistics and probability would let you know that, let alone personal experience.

             As for Arena's, U2 rarely plays arena's in Europe. Since 1990, they have only played arena's briefly in Europe in the summer of 1992 and the summer of 2001. In the summer of 1992, the speed of internet sales was not a factor since there were no tickets on that tour that were sold through the internet which leaves only the 2001 arena tour where modern buying practices were in place for a U2 arena tour in Europe.

            Yes, when artist do pre-sales, tickets are held back for the public, usually, but in Philadelphia for the first Vertigo show, this did not happen and all tickets were sold through the fan club.

            Where did I say U2.com was a deterent to scalpers? I've mentioned U2.com as an important way to get tickets if the band is playing arena's. But if the band is in stadiums in a 360 configeration, U2.com and scalpers don't matter in terms  of getting tickets. Both become relevant though if U2 go back into arena's.

            But one advantage that long time members of U2.com have since the new fan club started in 2004/2005 is that the first group of people that have maintained their membership each year for the past 7 years are in the higher first group Horizon group. That allows them to purchase tickets before most U2.com members who have not been members of U2.com every year since 2004/2005. While there may be some scalpers that have maintained a membership like that, its a much smaller number vs. scalpers who simply become members before the start of a tour and don't maintain a membership year after year when the band is not touring.

             These are all relevant things to consider and remember when thinking about the issue of U2 playing stadiums or arena's on the next tour.

The simple fact is your technique is wrong if you have trouble getting tickets. I've always managed to get floor tickets for arena dates. You're obviously doing it wrong.

As for the next tour if U2 don't pull their fingers out they will be forced back into arenas anyway so the demand for tickets simply won't be as high.

It goes without saying U2.coms cynical attempts to keep people buying a subscription are a disgrace.

                Its like this, when 15,000 people to an arena show all want floor tickets, only 2,000 are going to get floor tickets. Understand? When 66,000 people want tickets to a U2 arena show, only 18,500 are going to get tickets. Understand? No technique is going to change those facts.

                Also, no technique is going to get you tickets when tickets go on sell to the public, IF all tickets were already sold through the presale. Your technique can't get you tickets that have already been sold unless you go to a scalper.

Yes, I understand the maths, complex as it is.

We've already established only a limited number of tickets are available through all (or mostly all) pre sales so your point is invalid.

As a general rule, if a band plays arenas it's because that's all they can fill therefore demand goes down.

I've seen Springsteen in huge football stadiums and massive parks and festivals. Doesn't mean to say I couldn't get an arena ticket for the same tour relatively easily as that's exactly what I have done.

You're technique is all wrong.

             Well, you don't get it. If you can sellout one show through U2.com, you could do it for multiple others. There would be no chance of U2 being able to do that playing in stadiums in a 360 configeration. But if their playing in arena's the chances are far greater that would be the case and thats something everyone needs to consider when thinking about this issue of Stadiums vs Arena's. Again, were talking stadium shows with 66,500 capacity on average vs arenas with 18,500 capacity. Overall, your talking 110 shows in stadiums to 7.3 million people vs 110 shows in arenas to 2 million people. Even on POPMART U2 played to 3.9 million people which is nearly double of what they would do on a 110 date arena tour.

             Some artist who could fill or almost fill a stadium may choose to do arena's because you typically get fast sellouts and will play more than a single date allowing people more flexibility in attending the show as well as taking advantage of the people who go to multiple shows. When you play one giant show in a city like U2 often did on 360, you don't get to take advantage of  people who go to multiple shows and those who can't attend shows on that single particular date. Those are the selling advantages of being in an arena and if your only able to sell 35,000 tickets to a single stadium show in a certain city, you'd be better off playing two arena shows to a combined 38,000 people. You'll be able to sell the extra 3,000 tickets thanks to multiple show attendees and people who naturally would be unable to attend a particular single date. In addition, the cost of two arena shows is typically less than the cost of one stadium show.

               But I ask you, where is U2 currently barely able to sell 35,000 tickets for a single show of the cities they normally visit on a tour? This is an issue Coldplay is dealing with right now in the United States, but its not an issue for U2 given the level of demand for them.

               There were huge problems and complaints the last time U2 played arena's in the United States on Vertigo. But the essential point was that thousands of U2 fans failed to get into a show, or had to use scalpers, didn't get the tickets they desired etc.

               IF U2 contemplates doing arena's again for whatever the reason, they will have to consider the problems and complaints they experienced in the United States in 2005 and whether they want to go through that again.

               Bottom line, you have 7.3 million people that payed an average of $100 dollars to see you the last time you were on tour. What do you think will happen when you reduce the number of available tickets on the next tour to just 2 million? If you don't think there would be problems, you don't understand how business works. If you think the demand for U2 is going to plummet from 7.3 million to 2 million I have a bridge I want to sell you.

Sugarcube

  • Guest
Re: Should U2 quit playing stadiums after 360 ?
« Reply #74 on: May 15, 2012, 01:56:42 PM »
Again, a warning to all people are are not members of U2.com, if they do an arena tour next, you may not be able to get a ticket.  The first Philadelphia show for the Vertigo tour soldout through U2.com before any tickets were released to the general public. Given the number of people who are members of U2.com today vs back in 2005, I would not be surprised to see even U2.com members get locked out of certain Arena shows.

                                                   If they play arena's on the next tour, anyone obtaining general admission tickets will be able to sell them for $300+ dollars, if they so desired. Again, scalpers would love a U2 arena tour. General admission on the arena floor is 2,000 max, compared to an average of 15,000 for the stadium.

You're talking complete nonsense. I've never been a member of any fan site and have always got tickets to both arenas and stadiums. All you need is broadband and be on the Internet when tickets go on sale. Scalpers can get tickets to any show anywhere - its not hard to outwit a scalper.

U2.com is a massive con that charges fans to get what most other big artists give away for free. It's also no deterrent to Scalpers. They'll happily pay for a subscription if the profit outweighs the outlay

           I'm talking from personal experience of what happened to ME when attempting to get tickets to the first Philadelphia Arena show on the VERTIGO tour. I'm not a novice at getting tickets at all. I've been going to shows since 1991. I saw ZOO TV in Philadelphia multiple times, saw them in Philadelphia on POPMART, went to DC for Elevation but had friends that saw then in Philadelphia on Elevation. I also did eventually get to see them in Philadephia on Vetigo, but not the first show, and I saw them in Dublin Ireland on Vertigo as well. Saw them on 360 in DC, Baltimore and Philadelphia.

                  I understand perfectly the process of buying tickets and I'm here to tell you THERE WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC SELL TO THE FIRST PHILADELPHIA SHOW. Multiple people attempted to get through online with no luck at all. A small number even waited in line at a ticketmaster location. About two minutes before 10:00 AM, the site manager came out and told everyone in line that there WERE NO TICKETS AVAILABLE. Everyone who went to the first Philadelphia show on Vertigo either got tickets in the pre-sell through U2.com or payed double face value on average to a scalper through one of the ticket resell sites or outside the venue before the show.

                   Paul McGuinness a few weeks later admitted that they let the fan club purchase all available tickets because the sales were going so quickly for the first Vertigo Philadelphia show. I think that may have been the only show they did that for because they always have the option to hold back tickets and release them in the public sale. But the fact is, when demand is high, and supply is low like they are with arena shows, shows could be sold out without tickets ever being released to the general public. I saw it happen first hand.   

                     There was a 2nd, 3rd and 4th Philadelphia show, all of which rapidly soldout and while the number of shows did satisfy a lot of fans, there were still many others who got shut out or were unwilling to go to ticket resellers and scalpers and pay above list price for tickets.

                    Again, when supply is low and demand is high, its a ticket scalpers dream. Stadiums, especially stadiums in 360 pushes the scalpers to the side as the supply of tickets is enough to satisfy demand.

Then you're not trying hard enough - simples. I've gotten floor tickets to every arena show since I've been seeing U2. Both in Europe and the states. Of course I can't say this is typical as I haven't seen every show U2 have ever done - but neither have you.

When bands do a pre sale they allocate a certain  number of tickets to that pre sale so it's impossible for concerts to be sold out using this method. Any band that doesn't do that (i.e. U2 in your example) is ripping people off. Imagine the glee on McGuinesses face when he discovers a way to get the ticket price AND the cost of a U2 subscription for tickets.

Either way, a U2.com membership is no deterrent at all to scalpers. They will simply buy a subscription like everyone else. U2 don't care - it's a 'revenue stream' like any other 'revenue stream'.

Yes, there are always scalpers available with any tickets you would like, but I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about getting the tickets you want through the normal public sale for an 18,500 capacity arena where there are only 2,000 tickets for the floor. Its far more difficult to get what you want in that situation than it is when the band is playing a 66,500 capacity venue. Any understanding of math, statistics and probability would let you know that, let alone personal experience.

             As for Arena's, U2 rarely plays arena's in Europe. Since 1990, they have only played arena's briefly in Europe in the summer of 1992 and the summer of 2001. In the summer of 1992, the speed of internet sales was not a factor since there were no tickets on that tour that were sold through the internet which leaves only the 2001 arena tour where modern buying practices were in place for a U2 arena tour in Europe.

            Yes, when artist do pre-sales, tickets are held back for the public, usually, but in Philadelphia for the first Vertigo show, this did not happen and all tickets were sold through the fan club.

            Where did I say U2.com was a deterent to scalpers? I've mentioned U2.com as an important way to get tickets if the band is playing arena's. But if the band is in stadiums in a 360 configeration, U2.com and scalpers don't matter in terms  of getting tickets. Both become relevant though if U2 go back into arena's.

            But one advantage that long time members of U2.com have since the new fan club started in 2004/2005 is that the first group of people that have maintained their membership each year for the past 7 years are in the higher first group Horizon group. That allows them to purchase tickets before most U2.com members who have not been members of U2.com every year since 2004/2005. While there may be some scalpers that have maintained a membership like that, its a much smaller number vs. scalpers who simply become members before the start of a tour and don't maintain a membership year after year when the band is not touring.

             These are all relevant things to consider and remember when thinking about the issue of U2 playing stadiums or arena's on the next tour.

The simple fact is your technique is wrong if you have trouble getting tickets. I've always managed to get floor tickets for arena dates. You're obviously doing it wrong.

As for the next tour if U2 don't pull their fingers out they will be forced back into arenas anyway so the demand for tickets simply won't be as high.

It goes without saying U2.coms cynical attempts to keep people buying a subscription are a disgrace.

                Its like this, when 15,000 people to an arena show all want floor tickets, only 2,000 are going to get floor tickets. Understand? When 66,000 people want tickets to a U2 arena show, only 18,500 are going to get tickets. Understand? No technique is going to change those facts.

                Also, no technique is going to get you tickets when tickets go on sell to the public, IF all tickets were already sold through the presale. Your technique can't get you tickets that have already been sold unless you go to a scalper.

Yes, I understand the maths, complex as it is.

We've already established only a limited number of tickets are available through all (or mostly all) pre sales so your point is invalid.

As a general rule, if a band plays arenas it's because that's all they can fill therefore demand goes down.

I've seen Springsteen in huge football stadiums and massive parks and festivals. Doesn't mean to say I couldn't get an arena ticket for the same tour relatively easily as that's exactly what I have done.

You're technique is all wrong.

             Well, you don't get it. If you can sellout one show through U2.com, you could do it for multiple others. There would be no chance of U2 being able to do that playing in stadiums in a 360 configeration. But if their playing in arena's the chances are far greater that would be the case and thats something everyone needs to consider when thinking about this issue of Stadiums vs Arena's. Again, were talking stadium shows with 66,500 capacity on average vs arenas with 18,500 capacity. Overall, your talking 110 shows in stadiums to 7.3 million people vs 110 shows in arenas to 2 million people. Even on POPMART U2 played to 3.9 million people which is nearly double of what they would do on a 110 date arena tour.

             Some artist who could fill or almost fill a stadium may choose to do arena's because you typically get fast sellouts and will play more than a single date allowing people more flexibility in attending the show as well as taking advantage of the people who go to multiple shows. When you play one giant show in a city like U2 often did on 360, you don't get to take advantage of  people who go to multiple shows and those who can't attend shows on that single particular date. Those are the selling advantages of being in an arena and if your only able to sell 35,000 tickets to a single stadium show in a certain city, you'd be better off playing two arena shows to a combined 38,000 people. You'll be able to sell the extra 3,000 tickets thanks to multiple show attendees and people who naturally would be unable to attend a particular single date. In addition, the cost of two arena shows is typically less than the cost of one stadium show.

               But I ask you, where is U2 currently barely able to sell 35,000 tickets for a single show of the cities they normally visit on a tour? This is an issue Coldplay is dealing with right now in the United States, but its not an issue for U2 given the level of demand for them.

               There were huge problems and complaints the last time U2 played arena's in the United States on Vertigo. But the essential point was that thousands of U2 fans failed to get into a show, or had to use scalpers, didn't get the tickets they desired etc.

               IF U2 contemplates doing arena's again for whatever the reason, they will have to consider the problems and complaints they experienced in the United States in 2005 and whether they want to go through that again.

               Bottom line, you have 7.3 million people that payed an average of $100 dollars to see you the last time you were on tour. What do you think will happen when you reduce the number of available tickets on the next tour to just 2 million? If you don't think there would be problems, you don't understand how business works. If you think the demand for U2 is going to plummet from 7.3 million to 2 million I have a bridge I want to sell you.

You're simply not listening. The demand on the next tour will be much lower unless they pull something great out of the hat. So all your number crunching is irrelevant in this context. By your own admission if the next album is badly received like POP was, back into arenas they'll go and demand for tickets will go down.

I have enough bridges thank you but if you need some advice on securing tickets quickly and easily to either arena or stadium shows, I'm happy to help you out