Author Topic: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979  (Read 9835 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spooked1oo

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 803
  • Fourty-five lightyears from home
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #60 on: June 03, 2012, 03:32:43 PM »
I reckon there will not be another U2 album. I have been a fan since 1983. I judge their albums by how many times I listen to them long after they are released. The Joshua Tree and Achtung Baby are timeless. HTDAAB comes in third. The first side of Unforgettable fire is excellent. I cannot listen to ATYCLB or NLOTH at all now. I listen to songs from them but never the whole album.

oh, there will def. be another album, but it won't be till 2013 at the earliest. both sides of TUF are excellent.

I don't expect an album this year, but I don't think a single is out of the question.

Offline EnduringChill

  • Genius of Compression
  • ****
  • Posts: 32027
  • Help me sing my song... baby, it's all right
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #61 on: June 03, 2012, 03:42:23 PM »
I've never had the pleasure of waiting for a new U2 single, let alone an album. So thinking that there might be one is exciting. I just hope it happens...

The Grave

  • Guest
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #62 on: June 03, 2012, 03:48:13 PM »
I've never had the pleasure of waiting for a new U2 single, let alone an album. So thinking that there might be one is exciting. I just hope it happens...
I wouldn't call it a pleasure lol but it certainly is new  :D

I'd love for a new single this year but not very likely IMO

Offline spooked1oo

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 803
  • Fourty-five lightyears from home
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #63 on: June 03, 2012, 03:56:18 PM »
I've never had the pleasure of waiting for a new U2 single, let alone an album. So thinking that there might be one is exciting. I just hope it happens...

We're in the same boat. I became a U2 fan in 2010, and a big U2 fan in 2011. I'm looking forward to experiencing the release of the first single, the release of an album,  the hype of it's upcoming tour, and following the tour for as long as it runs.

Offline Spilling Over the Brim

  • Stateless
  • *
  • Posts: 108
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #64 on: June 03, 2012, 04:21:53 PM »
You've got to hand it to Bono, he still knows how to make some eyebrow raising remarks in regards to "up coming" U2 releases. Some things will never change. I am actually glad to hear some new comments(no matter who in the band it's from) about the next album. It felt like we really hit a dry spell for a while there. Gotta disagree with those saying these remarks are ego driven in any sense. After watching the segment of the show in which Bono appeared, his comments seemed clearly devoid of ego. He sounded like he was just being honest about the process. Surely by now he's earned the right to be honest about U2's recording sessions?

What really struck me is how different these words ring in print than they did coming out of Bono's mouth. On paper these quotes appear to be good reason for getting excited. However, watching the segment, I felt there was almost a downcast vibe to his comments about the studio work. He sounded sort of guarded and regretful that they hadn't sealed the deal in those three weeks - maybe it's just me though. Someone mentioned a few posts back these comments meant there would  be no next album, and I kinda picked up on that too. I got the sense that although he and the band were committed to finding a new and special sound/direction, that they might indeed call it quits if they couldn't come up with something great or worthy enough to carry the U2 name. Almost like they'd rather go out trying their best in the studio and failing rather than releasing something which didn't feel special to them - or at least something they weren't 100% on. I think we may need to accept this as a possibility. Again, maybe it's just me. I hope I'm wrong.

Offline tigerfan41

  • Headache in a Suitcase
  • *
  • Posts: 371
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #65 on: June 03, 2012, 06:20:43 PM »
U2 will have a mainstream radio hit again if they don't try for one and just put out their best material without regard or thought to whether or not it will get played on the radio.

For those of you with failing memories or are too young to remember, With or Without You was like absolutely nothing else being played on radio or MTV (yes, MTV was once a real force and actually used to ONLY play music) at the time. And yet once released got massive play on each.

The problem with this is the age bias present on popular radio today. When is the last time you heard an artist over 50 have a big hit on mainstream radio? It has NOTHING to do with the music and everything to do with the age of the band. Artists like Foster the People, Florence + The Machine, GOYTE etc. have all proven that music that is "different" can still get played a lot. What differentiates those artists from U2 (besides U2's obvious legacy as one of the best bands ever and not merely the flavor of the month) is age. They're all in their 20s or 30s.

U2, unfortunately, are not. They've been in the business for over 30 years and they're 50+. Most people consider them to be an old band. Most radio stations won't even consider giving them airplay, regardless of how good the music is because they're old. Other artists like the Chili Peppers, Pearl Jam, Springsteen and the Stones (when they release new music) have faced the same issue. The difference is, they've adjusted to it and continue to make music that is fulfilling to them. They don't care as much about commercial success. They're not worried about being "relevant". U2 (or at least Bono) have yet to accept this. If they did, they'd see it's more important to build on their legacy by releasing good music regardless of its radio-friendliness.

Honestly, I don't understand why Bono is so hung up on this--perhaps it's ego or being attention hungry? Even without U2 getting tons of attention on the radio, he's still Bono and he's still "relevant." You still hear about him all the time because of his charity efforts. You still hear about U2 because of the massive success of 360. So if it's an issue of ego, Bono is still getting his ego stroked plenty.

I just wish someone would shake some sense into Bono and possibly the rest of U2. They need to realize that the radio hit days are over and that it's better to just focus on the quality of the music, rather than continually scrapping things because it's not "radio friendly enough."

Offline Canadanne

  • Refugee
  • *
  • Posts: 252
  • The Devil has all the best tunes...
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #66 on: June 03, 2012, 08:34:51 PM »
I'm not sure it's true that being over 50 automatically means you're not allowed on the radio, but if it is true, it shouldn't be, so perhaps Bono is hoping they can change that rule?

Offline skelter

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 878
  • Drowning is no sin
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #67 on: June 03, 2012, 11:11:22 PM »
Why is Bono referring to U2 as "them"?

If you mean "they", it's because he's too good to be in a band at this moment. He's a living legend, a god among men. U2 are just his minions.

Seriously, this is exactly the vibe I got from the quote. And if he really meant it as it reads, it's incredibly sad and ridiculous.

Don't worry, I don't think he'd ever go on an ego trip like that. He never put himself above his mates iirc. I guess he just assumed everyone knew who he was talking about.

Yeah, I was really happy to read that quote from Bono about his bandmates ("they"). Sounds like they're all gettin' along well in the studios. It's part fangirling, part pragmatism, but I think enjoying the process and each other needs to come first before any music (from very good to great) can come out of it. At this stage, we all know they can just up and end it if they're not feelin' it.

The above quote made me knd of giggle... "They're amazing men. They're really extraordinary." It just seems silly to point that out, but hey, that's Bono for you... praising everyone.

That's our B-mac :D

Offline Zooropean

  • Wanderer
  • *
  • Posts: 50
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #68 on: June 04, 2012, 01:18:06 AM »
I just checked my Facebook page, where I'm also a fan of Depeche Mode.  I don't care if you like them or not: this is the kind of pre-album quote I can get behind:  "It's our fans that give us the freedom to release music we like rather than music we have to make."  This is from Andy, arguably the least important member of the band.  No "Martin's rediscovered the synthesizer..." or "David's on fire..."  It's simple, heartfelt, and completely acknowledges the debt they owe their fanbase which allows them to disregard (to some degree) hit singles, etc.  Sort of the opposite of Bono's recent "relevance" quotes.

What a great quote from Andy. Depeche Mode have always been overlooked ( in the industry) and as a fan I know the next album will be challenging, but worth it.
NLOTH was challenging , but didn't deliver the songs.
I do have some hope that Alan Wilder will work with DM again at some point, even as a producer. But as the teenage cancer performance indicated, Alan belongs on stage with them.

Slightly off topic.......

Offline Joan

  • Stranger in a Strange Land
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #69 on: June 04, 2012, 01:20:51 AM »
I think that Bono doesn't know what he wants and procrastinates rather than making a decision and sticking with it. He is running out of time and needs to be decisive and become a man of action instead waffling on talk shows. Maybe he is stuck in a moment that he can't get out of!?

Maybe there are internal management issues at U2? If so then get rid of them.

Whatever the problem is I do not see any evidence of any commitment to making a great album so we are most likely going to be disappointed.

Offline u2search

  • Babyface
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #70 on: June 04, 2012, 03:20:22 AM »
I was much more interested in what he said about "we need 10 very good reasons to leave home" or something like that. New album = new tour. Probably no new album before 2013, tour in 2014?

Best 3 weeks in the studio? Probably means they worked on 10 different songs, in stead of 3 weeks for 1 song.

Talking about 'they' - that's because the others won't alow him to be a band member!


Offline spooked1oo

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 803
  • Fourty-five lightyears from home
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #72 on: June 04, 2012, 06:49:37 AM »
http://www.independent.ie/lifestyle/independent-woman/celebrity-news-gossip/harry-to-roll-out-the-red-carpet-for-larry-3126029.html

"Meanwhile, U2 are working on a new album between their studio, next to Harry's home in Dublin docklands, and their houses."

Do any more-educated U2 fans know if that has any significance?



Offline codeguy

  • Refugee
  • *
  • Posts: 220
  • Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #73 on: June 04, 2012, 08:00:26 AM »
U2 will have a mainstream radio hit again if they don't try for one and just put out their best material without regard or thought to whether or not it will get played on the radio.

For those of you with failing memories or are too young to remember, With or Without You was like absolutely nothing else being played on radio or MTV (yes, MTV was once a real force and actually used to ONLY play music) at the time. And yet once released got massive play on each.

The problem with this is the age bias present on popular radio today. When is the last time you heard an artist over 50 have a big hit on mainstream radio? It has NOTHING to do with the music and everything to do with the age of the band. Artists like Foster the People, Florence + The Machine, GOYTE etc. have all proven that music that is "different" can still get played a lot. What differentiates those artists from U2 (besides U2's obvious legacy as one of the best bands ever and not merely the flavor of the month) is age. They're all in their 20s or 30s.

U2, unfortunately, are not. They've been in the business for over 30 years and they're 50+. Most people consider them to be an old band. Most radio stations won't even consider giving them airplay, regardless of how good the music is because they're old. Other artists like the Chili Peppers, Pearl Jam, Springsteen and the Stones (when they release new music) have faced the same issue. The difference is, they've adjusted to it and continue to make music that is fulfilling to them. They don't care as much about commercial success. They're not worried about being "relevant". U2 (or at least Bono) have yet to accept this. If they did, they'd see it's more important to build on their legacy by releasing good music regardless of its radio-friendliness.

Honestly, I don't understand why Bono is so hung up on this--perhaps it's ego or being attention hungry? Even without U2 getting tons of attention on the radio, he's still Bono and he's still "relevant." You still hear about him all the time because of his charity efforts. You still hear about U2 because of the massive success of 360. So if it's an issue of ego, Bono is still getting his ego stroked plenty.

I just wish someone would shake some sense into Bono and possibly the rest of U2. They need to realize that the radio hit days are over and that it's better to just focus on the quality of the music, rather than continually scrapping things because it's not "radio friendly enough."

Blah Blah Blah. We heard the same story before ATYCLB, and it gave us Beautiful Day and Elevation. We heard it again before HTDAAB, and we had Vertigo and COBL. The last album had no hits because it didn't have hitworthy material on it. A "HIT" is a non-definable thing these days. You can have a radio hit, a huge casual-fan hit, a movie-based hit, a youtube video hit, a dancefloor hit, a viral hit, Pandora, Spotify, Napster, etc. There are all kinds of ways people listen to music today.  U2 can have more hits. Anyone who thinks they cannot is underestimating them, as they were underestimated in 1990 when grunge was supposed to make 80's bands irrelevant, and again in 2000 when they were supposedly out of touch after POP. They came out swinging them, they could have one more great decade left in them.

Offline u2search

  • Babyface
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: U2's Best 3 Weeks in the Studio Since 1979
« Reply #74 on: June 04, 2012, 09:14:12 AM »
http://www.independent.ie/lifestyle/independent-woman/celebrity-news-gossip/harry-to-roll-out-the-red-carpet-for-larry-3126029.html

"Meanwhile, U2 are working on a new album between their studio, next to Harry's home in Dublin docklands, and their houses."

Do any more-educated U2 fans know if that has any significance?
It says it's still early stages: working in their home studio and in HQ. HQ happens to be next door to Harry's Crosby's house. Since they seem to love their old HQ, this is not a bad thing at all.