Author Topic: Tour Should be "Split" or delayed if 2nd album to follow  (Read 1317 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TitleTrack

  • Babyface
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Tour Should be "Split" or delayed if 2nd album to follow
« on: March 03, 2009, 02:01:54 AM »
If a 2nd album is truly to come out at the end of the year, the tour should be put off with sporadic appearance to suffice - but with water under the bridge  taking NA next year in a better, hopefully econ environment and giving for time to Europe would give a better product and more to work with - esp. after listening to NLOTH.



hurricane hugo

  • Guest
Re: Tour Should be "Split" or delayed if 2nd album to follow
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2009, 10:35:53 AM »
umm, dude - the tour IS being split. 50 dates this year, 70 next. The new album will give people another reason to see them again.  ;D

#@!

Offline cathalmc

  • Party Girl/Boy
  • **
  • Posts: 660
Re: Tour Should be "Split" or delayed if 2nd album to follow
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2009, 02:05:48 PM »

I think U2 usually have a couple of months break between legs of their tours to recharge for a bit. Plenty of time to mix up a new album from the stuff they've got hanging around :)