Author Topic: U2: Best to Worst  (Read 2628 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ElJayVee

  • Airborne Ranger
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,992
  • Love is clockworks and cold steel
Re: U2: Best to Worst
« Reply #15 on: March 04, 2009, 12:45:48 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
To be precise, it's the typical narrowminded rubbish that, should it be the band's point of view or judgement on their canon, would wipe their relevance immediately off the map. This is arrogant, and homework should be done... (I'm not sure Pride is their biggest hit up to date...)
Also including a just released album in a rank list is risqué to put it politely.

I'd say irresponsible. 

Again, a review is just one person's opinion, whether it's well-researched or not.  We can all respectfully disagree.

And I think we do.

Offline TraKianLite/Zooropa

  • Numb
  • **
  • Posts: 877
  • The land was flat, the highway straight and wide.
Re: U2: Best to Worst
« Reply #16 on: March 04, 2009, 12:53:59 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Jick workin for IGN now?

Zing.

Also, ignore that earlier comment about the article because it turns out that You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login. How that happened I have no idea.

Offline Ro~Jo

  • Stateless
  • *
  • Posts: 157
Re: U2: Best to Worst
« Reply #17 on: March 04, 2009, 05:40:05 PM »
Psh...just another critic that loves Joshua Tree, Achtung Baby, and their recent albums but dumps on Zooropa, Pop, and Rattle & Hum.  Here's my take, with ratings out of ten:

1. Achtung Baby (10)
2. Zooropa (9)
3. Pop (8)
4. Joshua Tree (8)
5. All That You Can't Leave Behind (7)
6. Rattle & Hum (7)
7. War (7)
8. How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb (5)

Don't have Boy, October, or TUF, not ready to rate NLOTH, but I'd say it's definitely going to be above ATYCLB.