@U2 Forum

@U2 HQ => Feedback, Suggestions and Help Desk => Topic started by: R3dLight [<33s TJ] on April 24, 2009, 06:13:40 AM

Title: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: R3dLight [<33s TJ] on April 24, 2009, 06:13:40 AM
Okay this idea came to me after noticing u2 shirtless is going down hill...
the burning hot thread has dropped to below freezing after it was moved!

there are MANY that supported me in this and wanted the boys back and in action, ive had many names sign the petition..

go to the band section of the forum under ------>should u2 shirtless be moved?!
 ;)
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 24, 2009, 06:53:47 AM
I will second this motion! We all know the real reason behind the thread and I do think the spirit in which it was conceived makes it well almost inappropriate in the Band section. Someone posted that we put things in that thread that we only want our Real World friends to read.

Please reconsider and move it back to where it belongs!
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: m2 on April 24, 2009, 06:09:32 PM
So you want us to move a thread to Real World because it'll be more popular there? Should we move everyone's thread to Real World, too? If we move this one, everyone will come asking for the same thing.

If it's about the band, it belongs in a band-related board. And if the content is such that it's not appropriate for a band-related board, then it's not appropriate for the forum as a whole. So maybe the best solution is just to remove it altogether. :)
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Northern Soul on April 24, 2009, 07:05:15 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
So you want us to move a thread to Real World because it'll be more popular there? Should we move everyone's thread to Real World, too? If we move this one, everyone will come asking for the same thing.

If it's about the band, it belongs in a band-related board. And if the content is such that it's not appropriate for a band-related board, then it's not appropriate for the forum as a whole. So maybe the best solution is just to remove it altogether. :)

I second this notion.   :D
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 24, 2009, 07:08:19 PM
I agree it should be in the Band section because it IS about U2, sorry girls  :-\

however, if you turn the thread into just a Shirtless thread, then it technically is about other guys, so you could change it to that and just take the penalty of it not being just U2 :-\
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 24, 2009, 07:59:04 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I agree it should be in the Band section because it IS about U2, sorry girls  :-\

however, if you turn the thread into just a Shirtless thread, then it technically is about other guys, so you could change it to that and just take the penalty of it not being just U2 :-\
And yet you signed the petition multiple times, Shock. LOL

M2-- very Solomonlike!
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 24, 2009, 08:02:23 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I agree it should be in the Band section because it IS about U2, sorry girls  :-\

however, if you turn the thread into just a Shirtless thread, then it technically is about other guys, so you could change it to that and just take the penalty of it not being just U2 :-\
And yet you signed the petition multiple times, Shock. LOL

M2-- very Solomonlike!

if you notice, i never put down SHOCKDOCTA22, which is my official name, so i technically never signed it ::)  LOL
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 24, 2009, 08:03:23 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I agree it should be in the Band section because it IS about U2, sorry girls  :-\

however, if you turn the thread into just a Shirtless thread, then it technically is about other guys, so you could change it to that and just take the penalty of it not being just U2 :-\
And yet you signed the petition multiple times, Shock. LOL

M2-- very Solomonlike!

if you notice, i never put down SHOCKDOCTA22, which is my official name, so i technically never signed it ::)  LOL
If that helps you sleep at night Shock. . . .;)
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Starfish on April 24, 2009, 08:17:04 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
If it's about the band, it belongs in a band-related board. And if the content is such that it's not appropriate for a band-related board, then it's not appropriate for the forum as a whole. So maybe the best solution is just to remove it altogether. :)

harsh  :'(
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 24, 2009, 08:20:47 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
If it's about the band, it belongs in a band-related board. And if the content is such that it's not appropriate for a band-related board, then it's not appropriate for the forum as a whole. So maybe the best solution is just to remove it altogether. :)

harsh  :'(
No, I smell a bit of irony. . . .
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Mysterious Ways on April 24, 2009, 08:49:17 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

M2-- very Solomonlike!

The thread shall be cut in half! :D

Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 24, 2009, 08:57:18 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

M2-- very Solomonlike!

The thread shall be cut in half! :D


One half in the Real World and one half in the Band section?
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Mysterious Ways on April 24, 2009, 09:01:12 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

M2-- very Solomonlike!

The thread shall be cut in half! :D


One half in the Real World and one half in the Band section?

Eeeeexactly.
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 24, 2009, 09:04:56 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

M2-- very Solomonlike!

The thread shall be cut in half! :D


One half in the Real World and one half in the Band section?

Eeeeexactly.
OK but I want to pick which half goes where. . . .
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 24, 2009, 09:05:49 PM
shirt pics in real world, descriptions in band section perhaps
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Discotheque Girl on April 25, 2009, 02:07:32 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
shirt pics in real world, descriptions in band section perhaps

Great!!

And how exactly are we going to do that??
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 25, 2009, 03:01:23 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
shirt pics in real world, descriptions in band section perhaps

Great!!

And how exactly are we going to do that??
I think we don't-- I think it will stand as it is. . . .

I cannot believe Shock signed off with 11499 posts!
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Boom Cha! on April 25, 2009, 12:58:13 PM
It belongs in The Band section.

Can't you people just scroll down the page a little more?  ::)
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 25, 2009, 01:46:23 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It belongs in The Band section.

Can't you people just scroll down the page a little more?  ::)
Boom, you just like the fact that with Shirtless in the Band section the Real World spotlight is back on you. . . .
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 25, 2009, 08:07:41 PM
Im just saying, Shirtless will last longer in the Band Section, because thats a less busy board, so it will be awhile till it leaves page 1
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: R3dLight [<33s TJ] on April 25, 2009, 09:32:00 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
shirt pics in real world, descriptions in band section perhaps

Great!!

And how exactly are we going to do that??

very carefully  :D
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 25, 2009, 11:56:59 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Im just saying, Shirtless will last longer in the Band Section, because thats a less busy board, so it will be awhile till it leaves page 1
Shock, Shirtless never got below p1 in the real world! We had a system of keeping it current!
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 26, 2009, 07:46:03 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Im just saying, Shirtless will last longer in the Band Section, because thats a less busy board, so it will be awhile till it leaves page 1
Shock, Shirtless never got below p1 in the real world! We had a system of keeping it current!

i saw it go all the way to page 4 once :D
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 26, 2009, 07:46:52 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Im just saying, Shirtless will last longer in the Band Section, because thats a less busy board, so it will be awhile till it leaves page 1
Shock, Shirtless never got below p1 in the real world! We had a system of keeping it current!

i saw it go all the way to page 4 once :D
I think that was the day I was traveling for work. . . .
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 26, 2009, 07:48:37 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Im just saying, Shirtless will last longer in the Band Section, because thats a less busy board, so it will be awhile till it leaves page 1
Shock, Shirtless never got below p1 in the real world! We had a system of keeping it current!

i saw it go all the way to page 4 once :D
I think that was the day I was traveling for work. . . .

::)
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 26, 2009, 07:55:33 PM
Still Shock I am a little sad that you saw Shirtless on page 4 and did nothing to bump it. . . .
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 26, 2009, 08:02:15 PM
Well you are the one that said it was wierd for me to post there ::)
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 26, 2009, 08:04:33 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Well you are the one that said it was wierd for me to post there ::)
Well posting and bumping are two entirely different things!

BTW-- how are you today?
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 26, 2009, 08:06:35 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Well you are the one that said it was wierd for me to post there ::)
Well posting and bumping are two entirely different things!

BTW-- how are you today?

Well...according to Forum Rules, we should not bump, because threads have a life cycle and should go to rest when people stop going there, and by bumping, we add really no content ::)

*Takes off mod face*

Im good, had a walk off homerun on my TOWN team today
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Mysterious Ways on April 26, 2009, 08:07:41 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Still Shock I am a little sad that you saw Shirtless on page 4 and did nothing to bump it. . . .

Yeah Shock. Real men aren't afraid to bump the Shirtless thread.  ::) :D :D
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 26, 2009, 08:13:28 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Well you are the one that said it was wierd for me to post there ::)
Well posting and bumping are two entirely different things!

BTW-- how are you today?

Well...according to Forum Rules, we should not bump, because threads have a life cycle and should go to rest when people stop going there, and by bumping, we add really no content ::)

*Takes off mod face*

Im good, had a walk off homerun on my TOWN team today
Yes but that rule wasn't widely touted when Shirtless was in the Real World!

Awesome about the game! Did the team win?
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 26, 2009, 08:15:07 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Well you are the one that said it was wierd for me to post there ::)
Well posting and bumping are two entirely different things!

BTW-- how are you today?

Well...according to Forum Rules, we should not bump, because threads have a life cycle and should go to rest when people stop going there, and by bumping, we add really no content ::)

*Takes off mod face*

Im good, had a walk off homerun on my TOWN team today
Yes but that rule wasn't widely touted when Shirtless was in the Real World!

Awesome about the game! Did the team win?

Walk Off homerun means to hit a homerun that wins the game...like bottom ninth
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 26, 2009, 08:17:54 PM
Oh I thought it was that you got a run as the result of a walk. . . my error. . . . I have been corrected. . . .


Congrats!
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 26, 2009, 08:18:52 PM
Thanks :)
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 26, 2009, 08:21:47 PM
When's the next game?
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 26, 2009, 08:22:52 PM
My next travel town team is wednesday

My first school game is tuesday :o
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 26, 2009, 08:29:39 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My next travel town team is wednesday

My first school game is tuesday :o
Cool. You know we are all rooting for you-- me especially. :)
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: shockdocta22 on April 26, 2009, 08:35:01 PM
Thanks Beli :)

I have to go

bye
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: Belisama on April 26, 2009, 08:44:02 PM
Night Shock!
Title: Re: Should U2 Shirtless Be Moved??????
Post by: m2 on April 26, 2009, 09:29:09 PM
Quote
Well...according to Forum Rules, we should not bump, because threads have a life cycle and should go to rest when people stop going there, and by bumping, we add really no content

Very well said, Shock....

And since this is not The Lounge, and the thread seems to have more than run its course for being a valuable part of Feedback & Suggestions, I'm locking it.